The Bristol Ugly Years - South East Asia
I wrote this personal view of Bristol Freighters on an Internet Forum - Aircraft Accidents, in response to the great sadness expressed at the demise of the last flying Bristol Freighter in England on 18 July 1996. At the time, I was on a long layover at Kansai airport in Japan and accessed the forum to find early information on the loss of TWA 800, the 747-100 that disintegrated south of Long Island NY. My interest was urgent because we at UPS were operating 2-3 sister aircraft that had originated from TWA. I fully expected these 747-100's of ours would be grounded awaiting the results of the NTSB's initial report on what happened to TWA 800. In the event, nothing happened, except the FBI took control of the investigation. The mystery of why our 747-100's weren't grounded is another story to be told! Anyway, on the same Forum, I saw an entry about the crash of Freighter NZ5912 and placed a message online, my personal take on its loss. So here it is: the way I really felt about the Bristol Ugly at that time.
The Bristol Ugly Affair 1996 - the last one crashes, Hurrah!!!Your information on the final demise of NZ5912 - as I knew this aircraft, brings memories flooding back but no nostalgia for the Bristol Ugly. We had a saying in the RNZAF transport squadrons to the effect that: "the Freighter might be rubbish, but at least it's British rubbish". Of course it came with Lucas Electrics ... The Prince of Darkness - guaranteed to keep you in the dark. This sad excuse for an airplane was the quintessential British Piece of Rubbish, or BPR for short. In the late 40's and early 50's the Brits did a brisk trade in BPR’s, flogging them off to their ex-colonial lackeys in exchange for lamb, butter, wool, tea, gold, diamonds, rubber etc. Even their own air force, the RAF, suffered the indignity of using these pieces of shite airplanes. The Blackburn Beverly comes to mind ... it even upstaged the Bristol Freighter in ugliness and uselessness. In 1958 I had the dubious pleasure of training on the Freighter and soloed first in NZ5912. It was one of the two dual equipped aircraft we had in the fleet of 12. I flew the Freighter off and on until 1968, mostly with No 41 Squadron RNZAF, based at RAF Changi in Singapore. We bumbled around Asia in this sad excuse for an airplane from Kathmandu to Tokyo, including airdrop operations in Malaya, Sarawak and short range transport support for our troops in Vietnam. I find it incomprehensible that there are pilots out there who can devote so much time, enthusiasm and money to "vintage" aircraft such as the Bristol Freighter. I remember the Freighter as a difficult aircraft to fly well … lacking pressurization, air conditioning, weather radar, retractable undercarriage or state of the art avionics. We cruised at 135 knots TAS, below 10,000 feet, sweating like pigs on the ground and freezing at cruise altitude. I'm sure I flew through every thunderstorm that built up in South East Asia in the 1960's, and while the torrential rain spilled on my feet, oozing through the instrument panel, the passengers unfurled their brollies and prayed for deliverance. The truth is that I never really mastered the art of flying the Freighter to its full potential, despite 4,500 hours of trying. The tail wheel configuration and obscure aerodynamic mysteries that Mr Bristol built into this aircraft, provided a challenge that was well beyond the abilities of average pilots like me. For example: when rounding out for a three point landing in this overgrown Tiger Moth, an error of just a few inches could result in a bounce like a spring healed rat [Qantas has them on the tail]. Recovery from this rather alarming maneuver was generally a missed approach, or a teeth shattering, barely controlled crash. When transiting the US military bases of Vietnam, the Philippines, Okinawa and Japan, we would get comments such as: "Is that an airplane, or the box it came in?" and "That's 40,000 rivets in loose formation" or "That airplane can't really fly, it's just so ugly that the earth immediately repels it". Fortunately, the Americans reserved their most cutting remarks for that other heap of British junk, the Blackburn Beverly. Even we, who flew the Bristol Freighter, considered the Beverly a joke, but it did have one advantage: On a flight plan ahead of us, we could follow the oil slick on the South China Sea that had been left behind by a Beverly. It would rarely arrive at it's destination with all four engines operating. Another problem with the Freighter was the crew compliment. Most of the aircraft cockpits were equipped for a single pilot, a navigator and a radio operator [signaller]. The navigator sat in the right seat, the signaller one pace to the rear and one behind [like a good adjutant]. The signaller kept to himself: busy changing frequency crystals in his steam driven Marconi VHF/HF radios - probably first tested on the RMS Titanic. The navigator was something else. Fortunately, they've been successfully replaced by INS's, GPS’s and other dumb, voiceless robots. Since those days, struggling with the Bristol Freighter, I've flown C-130's, various corporate jets, the Boeing 727, and for the last six years, the 747. I'm still hauling freight but the sweetest sound is the APU starting, the flow of conditioned air, the illumination of the Weather Radar scope, the triple INS nav system great-circling us around the world, and the Mach number registering 0.86.
Bristol Freighters: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Back to Top
|